Final writing exam 10% part B

Are you a geek?

In the present culture, computers are playing a major role in children developement. We introduce more and more education programs that are associated with technology and computers. The term "geek" has emmerged from our culture, and people are getting more interests in technologies. Geek is not to be confused with Nerd. A geek does not have to be smart, a Geek is someone who is generally not athletic, and enjoys Video Games; Comic Books; being on the internet, etc. Nonetheless, there is still a big gap between the males and females. So I decided to write an essay about a survey that I did.

First of all, the survey evolved around the hypothesis that boys are geekier than girls. Our questions were not just based on computers, but also on geek culture, like movies, games, or hobbies. We weren't surprised by the fact that boys had more knowledge of computers than girls, but by the fact that the gap between sexes was not that big. Yes we proved that boys tends to be more geeky than girls, but we also found out that there is actually geek girls in this world. Despite the internet phenomenon, more boys have interests in comic books, science fiction novels and role playing games.

Our second hypothesis was evolving around the fact that people who are geeks consider themselves as geeks. They do not deny the fact that they are geeks, and they are not ashamed of being geek. I have to say that our hypothesis was wrong, we have proven that people act as geek even if they don't consider themselves as some. I think that this is more of a cultural problem. People are lured into all of the technology and computers without realizing it. This was in fact pretty disturbing to find out that people can be uncounsciously attracted to technology. This is more pointed toward computers and technology, so we can still say that minority of people are reading science fiction novels or role playing.

As for the conclusion, the nerverending developement of technology is contributing for the growing of the geek culture. Males tends to be more geeky than females. But this can be associated to the fact that more boys are interrested in technology and computers. The majority of the people who are geek don't consider themselves as geeks. This can be associated to our culture, the dependance of people to technology and all those things. I had a lot of fun doing this survey, and the results were somehow surprising. Lets hope that not all of our society will be based on artificial intelligence for the near future.

478 words

Final writing exam 10% Part A

Unit 6 question 2:It is said that people will often do things in a crowd that they would never consider doing alone. Have you seen any evidence that this is true?

I think people will do more dangerous things when they are in a crowd because they blame everybody's attitude and not just themselves. It can be seen often when there is some massive crowd in the streets after an important sports event. Take example when our hockey team won an importan match. People started a riot and several infrastructures were destroyed.

Unit 7 question 3:When you are treated for an illness or injury, do you feel more comfortable doctor quickly determines what you are suffering from or if the doctor takes a long time?

When I am treated for an illness or injury I feel more comfortable when the doctor quickly determines what I am suffering. If the injury is determined faster it implies that the doctor has more knowledge and is more experienced. I can easily deduce the knowledge of a certain doctor by this fact.

Unit 10 question 5: There are many factors within human control that have contributed to the collapse of past societies. Which of the following factors are most likely to threaten civilizations today?

I think that we, humans, will be the major cause of the collapsing of our society. Human overpopulation will partially increase the treath, but we have the entire responsability over our survival. Our culture is feeding from war, and it is certainly that thing that will bring it down.

The Comedy of Errors
question 7: What underlying themes in the play are relevant today, such as the quest, loss of identity, family relationships, separation, family violence? In what way are they still relevant?

I think that the themes that are revelant today are the separation and family violence. Family detain the biggest part of our relationships today, but it is often neglected. People tends to ignore their families and they often en up as being separated from them or commit family violence.

mid term writing exam

Since the beginning of human life, there was no time for resting. Humans were born to run since the prehistoric ages. Humans are active because of their high concentration of muscles. Our body is a complex machine that requires to be active. Exercise is a big part of human nature, but is significantly decreasing by the modern way of living. Two famous writers have very different attitude toward exercise. Marcus Tullius Cicero, a Roman statesman and philosopher says that ­­­­­­­­'' It is exercise alone that supports the spirit and keeps the mind in vigor.'' Therefore Mark Twain, an American writer and humorist says that '' I have never taken any exercise, except for sleeping and resting, and I never intend to take any. Exercise is loathsome.'' I will express my idea about one of those statements.

First of all, I prefer Marcus attitude. I have to say that not doing exercise is the best way to have a fat body and a boring life. Exercising is the major component to increase well being. People that are exercising regularly have a feeling that they achieve something more in their life, thus providing more self-esteem. Have you ever got out of a pool after numerous hours of exercising and felt better than before because you are satisfied of yourself? I can easely say that exercising can facilitate you to achieve a better life.

Exercising is also the sole way to maintain good health. Everybody should know by now that this is the easiest and safest way to be healthy. It has been proven that exercising can provide a faster metabolism for the human body. Another benefit from exercising is that you can lose fat by doing it! Isn't that great? Stop being fooled by all the media about some miracle pills that will do the work for you. We all know that exercising is the only possible way to lose fat rapidly. We all seek the perfect body, therefore exercising is providing it.

Yet, there isn't really much bad things about exercising. If you think it is boring, then do it with friends or while listening to music. Exercising is the perfect way to keep everyone sane, and make them feel good too. It is proven that it makes people feel better, it is proven that it can help you be healthy, and it is proven that it will make you lose fat. So why would you even consider thinking like Mike Twain?

415 words

Inglourious Basterds Reviews

Back in his days as the geek god of clerks at Manhattan Beach Video Archives, Quentin Tarantino must have looked at all those World War II movies, especially the ones about plots to kill Hitler, and realized what was wrong: everybody knows the ending. Bad guys lose. Hitler died in his bunker. Where's the suspense? Where's the ambiguity? Most films about the war treat the historical record as sacred, which often serves as an excuse for lofty moral judgments. Only a few bold souls created alternative versions, like the 1963 film It Happened Here, in which Kevin Brownlow and Andrew Mollo imagined a Nazi-occupied Britain. Tarantino's rewrite is more brazen still, with a twist that's pure Hollywood. Hitler will die where? In a movie theater. And who will kill him? Some Jews.

Inglourious Basterds — the anomalies in spelling are to distinguish Tarantino's film from a not-so-hot 1978 Italian movie variation on The Dirty Dozen — convenes Resistance fighters from Germany and France and soldiers from Britain and the U.S. in a scheme to destroy the Third Reich. (Apparently the Russians were too busy actually winning the ground war to take part.) The Basterds are a unit of Jews — American and German — under the command of Brad Pitt's Lieutenant Aldo Raine, a tough, jovial hillbilly who sees his mission as the killing and scalping of Nazis. Any German soldiers, in fact. They're all the same to Aldo.

The scalping is appropriately detailed, and several guns are pointed at the tender areas of adversaries. But this is a 2 1/2-hour war movie without a single scene on the front lines. No long tracking shots of soldiers in foxholes or marching across an open field with a chorus of rifle fire. Fans of the operatic violence in Pulp Fiction and the Kill Bill movies eager for a thick new slab of steak Tarantino will be disappointed. There are glimpses of Q.T.'s deft cinematic footwork: a quick flashback to the Basterds' springing of a famous Nazi killer from prison; a moment in bed with a German officer and his French interpreter; a crowd shot in which high-ranking Nazis are ID'd with their names printed over their heads. Most of the film, though, reminds you that Tarantino may be a world-class director but what he really wants to do is write. Here the most explosive confrontations are verbal — long dialogues, often admirably tense and usually in French or German. (It's basically a foreign-language film.) The chats take the form of interrogations. A German officer probes; a Resistance fighter evades.

The officer, Colonel Hans Landa (Christoph Waltz), is a nastily smooth operator: oozing charm like pus, with a courtly tone and a preening self-regard. Known as the Jew Hunter, he calls himself a detective, trying to stop a war crime. Among his suspects are a French Jewess, Shosanna Dreyfus (Mélanie Laurent), who has escaped Landa's grasp and now runs a movie theater in Paris; and Bridget Von Hammersmark (Diane Kruger), a leading lady of German cinema who is secretly in league with British intelligence. Many Tarantino movies are female revenge fantasies, in which strong women plot the deaths of men who wronged them. In Shosanna and Bridget, the writer-director has fashioned two of his steeliest, most principled femmes fatales.

Laurent, Kruger and Waltz (who earned the Best Actor award at Cannes in May) are the soul of the film. Their conversations percolate with menace because Tarantino plants plot elements that blossom later for maximum impact. When Colonel Landa asks one of the ladies for her shoe and, at a restaurant, orders milk for the other, you feel nooses tightening around their necks and yours. In these scenes and another in a basement bar where the smallest wrong gesture cues a bloodbath, Tarantino shows how to achieve drama through whispers and forced smiles. The parallel plot of a budding romance between Shosanna and a German war hero (Daniel Brühl) has a similar trajectory — the pot simmers, then the lid blows off — and the same artful mix of subtlety and surprise. These vignettes work much better than the big set pieces, with the Nazis in the movie theater or the Basterds in the field. You needn't scalp a man to make his hair stand on end.

It's just possible that Tarantino, having played a trick on history, is also fooling his fans. They think they're in for a Hollywood-style war movie starring Brad Pitt. What they're really getting is the cagiest, craziest, grandest European film of the year.

With Inglourious Basterds, Quentin Tarantino has made his best movie since Pulp Fiction. He has also made what could arguably be considered the most audacious World War II movie of all-time. If you think there are rules for this sort of motion picture, guess again. And it's not just that Tarantino is using the spaghetti western as his template; it's that the sheer unpredictability of where all this is going makes it compelling from beginning to end. Even the film's occasional artistic flourishes (such as chapter titles and out-of-period music pieces) work within the context of what Tarantino is trying to accomplish. This is clearly an attempt by the director to expand his range and step outside of the comfort zone in which he has worked for the majority of his career.

Tarantino brings to Inglourious Basterds his not inconsiderable knowledge of films. The movie is awash in references - some subtle, some obvious - that run the gamut from D-grade exploitation flicks to A-list classics. This is not, as has been reported in some places, a remake of the 1978 feature The Inglorious Bastards, although the title is an homage. Reportedly, some of Tarantino's nascent versions of the screenplay used elements of the earlier film, but those are mostly gone in the final edition. This is pretty much 100% Tarantino, which could be good or bad, depending on your opinion of the man's work.

The plot follows two stories and, expectedly, brings them together at the end. In the first chapter, we are introduced to Shosanna Dreyfus (Melanie Laurent), a French Jew hiding with her family under the floorboards of a dairy farmer's house. The farmer is visited by the outwardly charming SS Colonel Hans Landa (Christoph Waltz), who has earned the nickname "The Jew Hunter." Unlike the average movie Nazi, this guy is smart - Sherlock Holmes smart. He quickly deduces that the farmer is harboring fugitives and has his men open fire at the floor. Shosanna is the only one to escape the massacre. She flees to Paris where, when the movie catches up with her later on, she is running a movie theater under an assumed name.

The other story follows the adventures of Lt. Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt) and his merry group of American "Basterds." They have parachuted into France behind enemy lines and are wreaking havoc. Their goal: kill Nazis. They don't take prisoners; they take scalps. They have become so infamous that even Hitler knows about them. Churchill and the British high command send in one of their own, Lt. Archie Hicox (Michael Fassbender), with a plan. New intelligence indicates that nearly the entire German upper echelon will be at a small theater in Paris for the premiere of a new propaganda film. The goal is to blow up the theater and kill as many of Hitler's top men as possible. To facilitate this, the Basterds will make contact with a double agent, German actress Bridget von Hammersmart (Diane Kruger). She will get them close enough to plant the bomb. Of course, the theater in question is the one owned by Shosanna.

Tarantino loves dialogue and, between taut, brutal action sequences, there's a lot of talking. The conversations aren't as elliptical as some of those in the director's previous efforts, but there are some intriguing moments - a Nazi providing a detailed comparison between Jew-hunting and rat-hunting, a 20 questions-like guessing game with the answer of "King Kong," and a reverse Cinderella encounter in which having a foot to fit the shoe is not a good thing. (Tarantino gets his trademark foot fetish shot in this scene.) There is a point to the talk, however, that goes beyond the filmmaker showing off his skill with words. All these scenes precede instances of sudden, violent action and the threat of bloodshed is heavy in the air. With every sentence, the tension mounts. Tarantino uses these sequences to prime the audience, teasing them until the suspense is nearly unbearable, then releasing it in one explosive burst.

Watching Inglourious Basterds, I was reminded of Paul Verhoeven's Black Book and Bryan Singer's Valkyrie, both of which contain themes and ideas that are echoed here. This is no Schindler's List. It's not about nobility or sacrifice. It's about the dirty, bloody side of war. Yes, there's heroism, but a lot is hidden away in order for those who receive medals to retain a patina of valor. Inglourious Basterds is suffused with dark humor - so much so that it's tempting to label it an action/comedy. There are laugh-out-loud moments, and not one guffaw is the result of something unintentional. This is nothing new for Tarantino, who has always interwoven humor with violence, but its incorporation here, amidst some of his bleakest material, is refreshingly unsettling.

Most Tarantino films feature at least one high-profile actor in a major role and, in this case, it's Brad Pitt. From his opening speech about the mission - one that recalls monologues from The Dirty Dozen and Patton - Pitt is clearly in character. His capabilities as an actor are often overlooked because of his high-profile off-screen image, but he takes chances and rarely gives a bad performance. (It's no coincidence he's liked by the Coen Brothers and Soderbergh.) As Raine, he's in top form, getting most of the best lines and generating a lot of the humor. The role is unlikely to garner Pitt an Oscar nomination, but it will be remembered.

Pitt's co-lead (although they never share the screen) is French actress Melanie Laurent, with whose body of work I am unfamiliar. She stands out - good looks and good acting. The character is nicely written, indicating that any previous problems Tarantino may have had with penning strong female characters were corrected in Kill Bill. She's from the same mold as Black Book's lead - as deadly as she is attractive, and ruthless beneath the seemingly unprepossessing exterior. Diane Kruger is the only other woman with a significant role in Inglourious Basterds, but Laurent is more memorable.

Christoph Waltz won an acting award at Cannes for his portrayal of Landa the Jew Hunter, and it's one of those deliciously twisted roles designed to unsettle audiences. He's like the lion who curls up at your feet and purrs as you stroke it, then suddenly jumps up and rips off your arm. It's a charismatic portrayal that shows how insidious evil can be. Perhaps that's unfair - Landa is not so much evil as he is coldly logical, amoral, and opportunistic. The character is a formidable adversary; Waltz is a formidable thespian.

There's a little stunt casting involved, although not as much as there might have been had scheduling conflicts not kept Adam Sandler from appearing. The role he was to play went to Eli Roth. It's interesting that the director of the "torture porn" Hostel movies should appear as a soldier who loves to beat Nazis to a pulp with a baseball bat while everyone around cheers. ("It's the closest thing we have to a movie," comments Raine at one point.) The only one who sticks out like a sore thumb is Mike Myers (playing a British general). He's not very good and he's not sufficiently camouflaged to avoid calling attention to himself.

Inglourious Basterds isn't as fresh and freewheeling as Pulp Fiction, but Tarantino is now an established director and a known quantity. That he is able to successfully pull off some of what he does in this movie is a testimony to his skill at both writing and directing. Yes - he borrows heavily and shamelessly from other movies, but it's in the unique fusion of those sources and styles that he achieves his success. Despite having so many antecedents, Inglourious Basterds quickly carves out its own niche. The running length is a gaudy 153 minutes, yet the film moves so smoothly and the moving parts come together so cleanly that the time passes easily. This is the movie I have been awaiting since Pulp Fiction. It's one hell of an enjoyable ride into the nightmare that was Nazi-occupied France, and thinking you know how it all ends doesn't make it so.

Inglourious Basterds isn't the greatest movie, but isn't the worst. The two and a half hour length sure can be very painful, but the dialogs can make it enjoyable. The movie is set in France during World War II. The story is revolving around a group of Jews called the "basterds" who are aiming to kill the most Nazis they can. Brad Pitt is playing the role of Lt. Aldo Rain very stereotypically. The actors are OK, but one is standing out. The German officer played by Christopher Waltz is one of the best actor I've seen in this movie, he is the reason I kept watching.

Basically the movie is very reminiscent of any other work of Quentin Tarantino, long,lots of dialogs, and very strange twist at the end. If you liked his films, you will like this one, but be prepared to see a lot of gore and violence. The movie is also very well done( good camera angles and shots), but the down side is really the longs scenes .

Learning Express Library A

1. Title

1. Interest Level
2. Difficulty Level
3. Three Things I Learned
4. My Score
5. Course Rating

2. Title

1. Interest Level
2. Difficulty Level
3. Three Things I Learned
4. My Score
5. Course Rating

GAINS Ice-Breaker

Today was my first english Class. We attempted an activity called GAINS. Each student had to pick someone and get to know him by talking about different aspects of his life. I had the oportunity to meet Guillaume Renaud. Guillaume is a very interresting and friendly guy. His primary goal would be to find his study department and get a PHD. For the short term goal, he wishes to finish this session with good grades. His main achievement is that he was able to finish highschool. Guillaume is very interrested in music. He listen primarly to metal genre and sometimes punk music. His network of friends is limited to his phone. He described that texting is his favorite way of comunication, and he doesn't use facebook or any other type of network.

The most interresting thing about this guy are his skills. He is a percutions and drum player. He owns a good set of percutions and he knows how to play it! Guillaume is using a 2003 sonar model drum. He is also learning to record music with his drum because he owns a set of microphones. Guillaume also plays a little bit of guitar, but after he discovered percutions he switched to drum playing. His style of playing is often credited as metal and punk music; those are very technical and fast paced.